Evaluative Statement
During my studies of INF206; Social Networking for Information Professionals, I have increased my understanding of social networking technologies and the concept of Library 2.0, which focuses on user input into library services. In this blog I was able to address the learning objectives of the subject which are: to demonstrate an understanding of social networking technologies and Library 2.0, to critically examine the features and functionality of social networking tools and how they can meet the needs of users and support the organisation, and lastly to demonstrate an understanding of some of the issues that are present in a socially networked world (O’Connell, 2011).
The first post required for the subject was to define social networking, which I felt was largely concerned with maintaining and expanding relationships and collaborating online. During the course of the subject I immersed myself within many different social networking technologies such as Facebook, Flickr, Delicious, Twitter, Second Life and Linked in and learned how to incorporate aspects of these social media tools into my blog; such as Delicious tag clouds, Twitter RSS feeds and displaying updates of my Flickr photos. Since completing the modules and spending time exploring these technologies my definition of social networking has grown to incorporate an emphasis on sharing and communicating online with other users by contributing content.
In the post Facebook and Hootsuite, the benefits and pitfalls to using Facebook from a user’s perspective and within the library have been discussed. The layout of Facebook, with its continual updates, can make it difficult to locate older posts and distinguish between what has already been read or not. However its simplicity and ease of use makes it a great tool for sharing all types of information, such as video and audio files, and its popularity of over 800 million active users (Facebook, 2011), provides a good opportunity for library’s to connect with people. However it is important for organisations intending on using Facebook for providing services and information to users to remember that they need to be active users themselves and update the page regularly in order to have a consistent presence and make the most of this online technology.
Adopting social networking technologies, such as Facebook, is one way library’s can implement library 2.0 and become more user-centred. The term Library 2.0 stemmed from the term Web 2.0, which is the second generation of web-based services that are more user-driven and focus on participation, sharing and online collaboration (Peltier-Davis, 2009, p. 18). Therefore, Library 2.0 is centred on users participating in the library’s web presence by contributing content (Maness, 2006), and according to Sodt and Summey, also includes any service that makes use of customer input and is evaluated regularly (2009, p. 99). By having a more participatory library service through the use of social networking technologies, libraries can gain a better understanding of users’ needs from their feedback and comments, and then develop services and select resources to meet these needs.
Before adopting a social networking technology in an organisation such as a library, the technology should first be evaluated in terms of the benefits it can bring to the organisation, how it can meet user needs, and should also be compared against similar tools. The library should consider things like staff training, implementation issues, and the time required to manage content to determine not only if it is feasible to implement the technology but also whether a particular tool is the best choice for both the library and the users. The post Yummy Bookmarks discusses some of the features of the social bookmarking site Delicious and how it could be used internally amongst library staff and externally to support users through sharing online content. By using Delicious for my own personal bookmarks during this subject I was able to gain a better understanding of its features such as the browser icons to add and share bookmarks and the create tags function to organise them. This experience helped me to consider its possible applications within a library setting and compare its functionality with other sites such as Twitter.
Throughout this subject I have also increased my understanding of issues that exist in this socially networked world. For instance, the post Restricting Access addresses ethical and social issues, such as the digital divide and how limited access to the internet can affect equal opportunity to access information. This post also addresses technical issues such as the bandwidth required to support social networking sites and educational issues involved with restricting student access to certain resources within schools.
Reflective statement
Over the course of this subject I have learnt how to use a number of social networking technologies I was previously unfamiliar with, become more aware of the implications of adopting social media tools within a library and the steps that need to be considered, and also how the tools can be beneficial to an organisation to help meet users’ needs. At the beginning of the subject my expectations were written in my first blog post, which was to learn more about social networking and social media sites and how they can be used from an organisational perspective to connect with users as well as their functionality from a user’s perspective.
I was able to learn about social networking technologies from a users’ perspective by joining a number of different social media sites and using them throughout the subject. When I first began I only had experience using Facebook, Google Docs, Blogger and Wikipedia, and since then can add Twitter, Delicious, Flickr, Second Life, RSS feeds and Linked In to the list. By actively participating in these online technologies I was able to experiment with different features such as tagging in Flickr and following people in Twitter, and was able to get an idea of how these technologies could be used in a library to connect with users. For instance, Twitter could be used to inform people of events at the library and provide regular updates on services and resources, and RSS feeds can be used to send website updates to users in a way that allows them to view the information in their own time and place without having to delve through many complex websites to find it.
Information professionals in libraries could use social networking technologies in a number of ways such as for promotional purposes, to increase their online presence, to maintain contacts and extend their client-base, to provide reference services, increase participation within the library by encouraging feedback and involvement, collate user data through polls, surveys and comments to develop services and to provide library news and updates. This subject has taught me that there are many ways that libraries can make use of social networking tools and that it is especially important in today’s society due to the huge number of people using these platforms. Therefore in order to stay current and remain relevant to users, libraries need to be involved in social networking sites because that is where the users are.
Throughout this subject I have also learnt a number of important points in regards to social networking as an information professional, such as the importance of having a social media policy. This is necessary for organisations adopting social networking technologies because it ‘can help establish clear guidelines for staff members who are posting on behalf of the organisation as well as employees with personal social media accounts’ (Kroski, 2009, p. 45). The policy can also include information on what staff can contribute to these sites, how to minimise potential risks and can highlight issues surrounding privacy and security in regards to social networking. Another important point was to be cautious on what you post whether you are posting on behalf of an organisation or yourself because once the information is out there anyone can see it.
Overall, I feel that by immersing myself within these technologies I was able to gain a better understanding of how they could be used from an organisational perspective and the benefits to using them from a users’ perspective. I intend to continue using Delicious, Twitter and Facebook for personal use, and may even start a personal blog with the skills I have learnt. From the perspective of an information professional I hope to contribute some of the skills and information I have learned to help develop and improve library services by implementing social networking technologies that are beneficial to users. In conclusion, INF206 has provided me with a better understanding of social networking tools, the concept of a more participatory library practice and an increased awareness of some of the issues involved at an organisational level, such as bandwidth issues, and at a broader level, such as online security and information access issues.
References
Kroski, E. (2009). Should your library have a social media policy? School Library Journal, 55(10), 44-46
Maness, J. (2006). Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology, 3 (2), Article 25. Retrieved from: http://www.webology.org/2006/v3n2/a25.html
O’Connell, J. (2011). Social Networking for Information Professionals [INF206 201160 Subject Outline]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: http://interact.csu.edu.au/portal/site/INF206_201160_W_D/page/58773d30-075c-4ac7-8062-19d900f1079a
Peltier-Davis, C. (2009). Web 2.0, library 2.0, library user 2.0: innovative services for sustainable libraries. Computers in Libraries, 29(10), 16-21. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
Sodt, J. M., & Summey, T. (2009). Beyond the library's walls: Using library 2.0 tools to reach out to all users. Journal of Library Administration, 49(1/2), 97-109. Doi:10.1080/01930820802312854
Facebook (2011). Facebook Statistics. Retrieved on the 7th of October from: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics



















